The Fight for Fair Pay: Ilhan Omar's Scrutiny of UFC's Boxing Plans
In a hearing that sparked intense debate, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar took center stage, questioning the UFC's proposed boxing revival act and its potential impact on fighter compensation. But here's where it gets controversial: the UFC's track record with athlete pay has raised concerns, and Omar is determined to get answers.
The Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act aims to revolutionize boxing by adopting UFC-style promotion, but it's not without its critics. This proposed law is currently making its way through Congress, and its potential implications are a hot topic.
On Thursday, a hearing titled "In Their Corner: Creating More Opportunities for American Boxers" shed light on this controversial issue. Witnesses, including Lawrence Epstein, a senior executive from the UFC, and Pat English, an architect of the original Muhammad Ali Act, faced tough questions from the Workforce Protections Subcommittee.
The key argument from supporters of the bill revolves around creating more opportunities for boxers through Unified Boxing Organizations (UBOs). UBOs would essentially bring UFC's promotional style to boxing, with internal rankings, titles, and exclusive contracts. However, critics argue that this new system might not be as beneficial as it seems.
And this is the part most people miss: the new Ali Revival Act is an addition to existing laws, not a replacement. So, boxers still have the option to operate under the current system.
During her testimony, Congresswoman Omar, an avid combat sports fan, zeroed in on Epstein, asking about the revenue share boxers could expect under the UBO model. She referenced the UFC's antitrust lawsuits, where it was revealed that fighters were paid significantly less compared to athletes in other major sports.
"Mr. Epstein, the UFC settled an antitrust case after allegations of restrictive contracts and keeping fighter pay at a mere 15 to 20 percent of revenue. So, what minimum share of event revenues can you guarantee boxers under the Zuffa Boxing league?" Omar asked.
Zuffa Boxing, backed by Saudi Arabia's General Entertainment Authority, plans to launch in 2026 and has already secured a broadcast deal with Paramount. However, Epstein was hesitant to provide a concrete answer, as the organization hasn't held any events yet.
"First, let's address the lawsuit. We settled it, but there was no finding of liability. As for committing to a percentage, we're starting a new business. If this legislation passes, we'll be starting from scratch," Epstein explained.
The first UFC antitrust lawsuit, filed in 2014, was settled for a whopping $375 million, with more lawsuits still pending. Omar's next question to Epstein was equally pointed.
"UFC is facing more lawsuits, not just for wage suppression but also for allegedly withholding evidence crucial to the antitrust claims. With these ongoing legal battles, how can fighters trust they'll be paid fairly in this system?" Omar asked.
Epstein's response focused on choice, stating that the new law wouldn't eliminate the original Ali Act protections but offer an alternative. He argued that boxers would have a choice between the new system and the existing one.
"The current state of boxing is a disaster. There's no consistent broadcasting of boxing events in the US. The UBOs could give boxing a chance, but ultimately, it's a choice for athletes. If they don't like it, they can stick with the current system," Epstein said.
Andy Foster, who recently presided over a hearing supporting the new Ali Revival Act, also spoke about the mismatches in boxing, where promoters build their fighters against substandard competition. He believes the UBO formula, with all fighters signed to the same promotion, could lead to better matchmaking.
"Focusing on competitive matches rather than protecting your fighter would be a positive step for boxing," Foster stated.
At the hearing's end, Omar acknowledged the act's benefits but emphasized the need for further refinement before it becomes law. She urged her colleagues to consult with those directly impacted by these reforms and ensure an informed policy decision that benefits workers and small businesses in sports.
"Let's hear all perspectives and make sure we're helping those who need it most," Omar concluded.
